Carbon Accounting & Climate Disclosure Work

Regulatory-grade readiness reviews that translate sustainability reports into clear gap lists and next steps.

📊 Featured Project: Atlassian FY25 Gap Analysis

Atlassian FY25 Sustainability Report — CSRD / IFRS S1-S2 / California / ASRS review

Atlassian FY25 ESG Gaps and Readiness (1).pdf

Overview

This artifact distills a gap analysis of Atlassian’s FY25 Sustainability Report against:

• CSRD & CSDDD (EU)
• IFRS S1/S2
• California climate laws (SB 253 / SB 261 / AB 1305)
• ASRS (Australia)

🎯 Key takeaway

Strong voluntary reporting momentum—but uneven readiness for regulatory-grade, data-driven disclosure.

Atlassian is ahead of many software peers on climate reporting progress (materiality, renewables, and operational emissions reduction), but the next wave of ESG requirements will demand deeper, more quantified reporting—especially for AI/infrastructure impacts, Scope 3 credibility, and digital reporting readiness.

Key findings (quick scan)

✅ What’s working

• Double materiality assessment completed (a major step toward CSRD-style prioritization)